A Comprehensive Survey on State Estimation Techniques in Electrical Power Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.5164Abstract
State estimation (SE) is a fundamental component of modern electrical power system operation, enabling accurate monitoring, control, and security assessment of the grid. It provides the best possible estimate of system states, such as bus voltage magnitudes and phase angles, using redundant and noisy measurements. With the increasing complexity of power networks, driven by renewable energy integration and smart grid technologies, the role of state estimation has become more critical than ever. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of state estimation techniques used in electrical power systems.
Classical approaches, including the Weighted Least Squares (WLS) and Least Absolute Value (LAV) methods, are discussed in detail. Their mathematical formulations, advantages, and limitations are analyzed to provide a strong theoretical foundation. Robust estimation techniques, such as Huber estimators and Least Median Squares, are also explored for their ability to handle bad data and measurement errors. The paper further examines dynamic state estimation methods based on Kalman filtering, including the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) and Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF). These methods are particularly useful for real-time monitoring and dynamic system analysis. The integration of Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) has significantly enhanced the accuracy and speed of state estimation. PMU-based and hybrid state estimation techniques are reviewed for their ability to provide synchronized and high-resolution measurements. Distribution system state estimation (DSSE) is also discussed, considering the challenges of limited measurements and system uncertainties. In addition, the paper highlights the emergence of artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques in state estimation. These data-driven approaches offer improved performance in handling nonlinearities and large datasets. A comparative analysis of various techniques is presented based on accuracy, robustness, and computational complexity. The paper also addresses key challenges, including bad data detection, cyber-security threats, communication delays, and scalability issues. Special emphasis is given to the impact of renewable energy sources on state estimation accuracy and reliability. The survey further explores recent advancements in hybrid and distributed state estimation frameworks. Future research directions are identified, including AI-integrated estimation, blockchain-based energy systems, and real-time big data analytics. The need for secure and resilient state estimation methods in smart grids is also emphasized. This paper aims to serve as a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners working in the field of power system monitoring and control. It provides a structured overview of existing techniques while highlighting emerging trends and opportunities. The findings of this survey contribute to the development of more efficient and reliable state estimation methods. Ultimately, improved state estimation techniques will enhance the stability, efficiency, and sustainability of modern power systems
References
[1] Schweppe, Fred C. Power System Static-State Estimation. IEEE Press, 1970.
[2] Monticelli, Alcir. State Estimation in Electric Power Systems: A Generalized Approach. Springer, 1999.
[3] Abur, Ali, and Antonio Gmez Expósito. Power System State Estimation: Theory and Implementation. CRC Press, 2004.
[4] Handschin, E., et al. Identification of Bad Data in Power System State Estimation.IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-94, no. 2, 1975, pp. 329-337.
[5] Korres, George N. A Robust Algorithm for Power System State Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 4, 2011, pp. 2466-2476.
[6] Wu, Felix F., et al. Power System State Estimation: A Survey.International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, 1990, pp. 80-87.
[7] Mili, Lamine, et al. Robust State Estimation Based on Least Median of Squares.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 11, no. 2, 1996, pp. 1118-1127.
[8] Girgis, Adel A., and Christopher M. Fallon. Dynamic State Estimation in Electric Power Systems Using Kalman Filtering. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-101, no. 9, 1982, pp. 3371-3378.
[9] Anderson, Brian D. O., and John B. Moore. Optimal Filtering. Prentice Hall, 1979.
[10] Singh, Harpal, and Bikash C. Pal. Dynamic State Estimation Using Extended Kalman Filter.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 3, 2011, pp. 1393-1401.
[11] Julier, Simon J., and Jeffrey K. Uhlmann. Unscented Filtering and Nonlinear Estimation.Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92, no. 3, 2004, pp. 401-422.
[12]Phadke, Arun G., et al. Synchronized Phasor Measurements in Power Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-105, no. 7, 1986, pp. 1980-1987.
[13]Chakrabarti, S., E. Kyriakides, and D. G. Eliades. Placement of Synchronized Measurements for Power System Observability. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 24, no. 1, 2009, pp. 12-19.
[14]Kekatos, Vassilis, et al. Distributed Robust Power System State Estimation.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, 2013, pp. 1617-1626.
[15]Baran, Mesut E., and A. W. Kelley. State Estimation for Real-Time Monitoring of Distribution Systems.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 10, no. 3, 1995, pp. 1601-1609.
[16] Singh, Rajat, Bikash C. Pal, and Rabih A. Jabr. Distribution System State Estimation through Gaussian Mixture Model.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, 2009, pp. 1567-1575.
[17]Primadianto, Anggoro, and Chao Lu. A Review of Distribution System State Estimation.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 73, 2017, pp. 1256-1265.
[18] Zhou, Qi, et al. Cybersecurity of Power Systems: State-of-the-Art Review.Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 105, no. 7, 2017, pp. 1239-1255.
[19] Liu, Yao, Peng Ning, and Michael K. Reiter. False Data Injection Attacks against State Estimation.ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, vol. 14, no. 1, 2011, pp. 1-33.
[20]He, Yu, et al. Neural Network-Based Power System State Estimation. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 78, 2016, pp. 33-41.
[21] Wang, Zhaoyu, et al. Deep Learning-Based State Estimation in Power Systems.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 3, 2019, pp. 2766-2775.
[22] Zhao, Junbo, et al. Power System State Estimation Using Machine Learning.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 4, 2020, pp. 3063-3074.
[23] Mohammadi, Mehdi, et al. Hybrid Artificial Intelligence-Based State Estimation. Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 189, 2021, p. 106785.
[24] Kumar, Anil, et al. Hybrid PMU-Based State Estimation for Smart Grids. IEEE Access, vol. 11, 2023, pp. 45213-45225.
[26]Recent Advances in AI and Big Data for Power System State Estimation.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2024-2025 (various articles).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.